A bill has been introduced into Congress to ban TV
commercials for Viagra and other boner pills between the hours of 6:00
a.m and 10:00 p.m.
In other words, Congress hates boners.
My first
reaction to Congress's latest attempt to put more government control in
our lives was WHAT THE FUCK? Why does Congress not want the bonerless
to become bonerable?
Old people are in bed by 10:00 p.m. What would be the point of airing Viagra commercials after that hour?
Personally,
I don't start watching TV until late at night. The last thing I want
is the image of two old people having sex. Because the Pharmaceutical
company that makes Viagra would be forced to only air commercials after
10:00, it is safe to assume that boner ads would rule the airwaves during
MY prime time viewing.
But.....
If I had daughters, do I
really want to explain the boner to them? The very last thing I would
want to deal with as a father would be having a daughter ask me what
erectile disfunction is.
But...
Since I am not a father nor do I have boner problems, I have to look at this legislation subjectively.
So...
I will.
If
Congress gets their way with limiting these commercials, where do we
draw the line? What else would they consider banning before 10:00
p.m.? Tampon commercials? Condom ads? Douche commercials? Toilet
paper? Preparation H?
Why not Nyquil ads? The coughing, aching,
sneezy, stuffy headed medicine is no more or less offensive than
something that assists a different part of the body.
But...
Once again, should a 10 year old girl have to learn about boners from a TV commercial?
I was not even aware that this was an issue. I have never heard a parent complain about this.
Viagra
ads do not air during episodes of Hannah Montana because preteens are
not the target audience. However, Viagra ads do air during episodes of
Wheel of Fortune. Why? Because the impotent are more likely to be
watching a game show than a kids show.
Unless...
The
impotent happen to be pedophiles. But if a pedophile is unable to get
it up, what is the point of them watching a show aimed at preteens?
Either way, it's a non-issue for me.
Maybe Congress should spend more time worrying about the actual TV shows that precede the commercials for Viagra.
Or...
Maybe Congress should worry more about lessening the stress that this shitty economy is putting some of us under.
Less Stress= More Boners.
More Boners= Less need for Viagra
Less Need for Viagra= Less Need for Viagra ads.
So....
What do you think?
No comments:
Post a Comment